Attitudes Toward Routine Vaccines and COVID-19 Vaccines Among Parents of Infants and Toddlers in an Urban Safety-Net Setting.

This study explores attitudes toward diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP), measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), influenza, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines among English-speaking and Spanish-speaking parents of infants in a safety-net setting. Parents aged 18 years or older were recruited from outpatient clinics between December 2020 and December 2021. The interviews were then recorded, transcribed, translated, and qualitatively analyzed using the modified grounded theory. Thirty-two individuals participated (18 English-speaking and 14 Spanish-speaking). Almost all supported receiving routine childhood vaccines, DTaP, influenza, and MMR and believed that vaccines promote health. Vaccine concerns differed by each vaccine. Few participants expressed concerns about DTaP and MMR vaccines. Concerns around influenza vaccines often stemmed from personal experience and perceived increased risk of flu-like illnesses. Participants expressed the most concerns related to COVID-19 vaccinations, including age-based immunity of their infants. Based on these findings, future interventions to improve vaccine uptake may focus on benefits common to all vaccines, while addressing vaccine-specific concerns.

Initial results of DMEK combined with cataract surgery and implantation of the light-adjustable lens.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of light-adjustable intraocular lenses (LALs) to maximize visual acuity (VA) postoperatively in eyes undergoing combined Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and cataract surgery. SETTING: Private practice, tertiary referral center. DESIGN: Retrospective review of initial case series. METHODS: Patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy had DMEK combined with phacoemulsification and LAL implantation. Lenses were adjusted based on postoperative manifest refraction and locked-in 3 to 6 months postoperatively. Adjustments to the LAL were started after stabilization of refraction at sequential examinations. Outcomes were uncorrected near and distance VA and manifest refraction 3 to 6 months after locking the lens. RESULTS: A total of 27 eyes in 17 patients with mean age of 65 years (range 53 to 75 years) were included in this study. 6 eyes (22%) had either a near or intermediate target, and 21 eyes (78%) had a distance target. After lock-in, 57% of eyes with a distance target had uncorrected distance VA (UDVA) of 20/20 or better, 90% were 20/25 or better, and 100% were 20/40 or better. After lens lock-in, 100% of eyes had corrected distance VA (CDVA) of 20/20 or better, 86% had postoperative UDVA the same or better than preoperative CDVA, and 100% of eyes had UDVA within 1 line of the preoperative CDVA. In total, 93% of eyes were within 1 diopter (D) of spherical target, and 93% of eyes had ≤0.5 D of refractive cylinder postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Combining DMEK with LAL implantation provided significantly better UDVA and refractive outcomes than previously reported data on combined implantation of a standard monofocal lens.

Comparison of attitudes toward routine maternal vaccines and COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant patients in an urban safety-net setting.

OBJECTIVE: To explore attitudes toward tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap), influenza, and COVID vaccines among English- and Spanish- speaking pregnant individuals in a safety net setting. METHODS: Pregnant people aged 18 years or older were recruited from outpatient clinics between August 2020 and June 2021. Interviews were conducted via phone in English or Spanish, recorded, transcribed, and translated verbatim. Data were qualitatively analyzed using modified grounded theory and content analysis. RESULTS: 42 patients participated (22 English-speaking, 20 Spanish-speaking). Most participants expressed positive attitudes towards both routine prenatal vaccinations and COVID-19 vaccines, endorsing the belief that vaccines promote health and considering vaccines a social norm. Positive attitudes were similar for the three vaccines, and among Spanish- and English-speaking individuals. Participants trusted their healthcare provider's recommendations and felt comfortable receiving booster doses of vaccines they had received successfully in the past. Vaccine concerns differed by each vaccine. Despite limited knowledge, few participants expressed concerns about Tdap vaccines. Concerns around influenza vaccines often stemmed from personal experience and centered around ineffectiveness and increased risk of flu-like illnesses. Participants expressed the most concerns related to COVID vaccinations, including misinformation about serious side effects and distrust around accelerated approval of the vaccines. Many participants wished to know more about the side effects and safety of vaccinating during pregnancy, especially regarding the fetus's health. CONCLUSIONS: Most participants supported routine prenatal vaccinations, including COVID vaccines. Clinicians are trusted information sources and can help reinforce positive attitudes and social norms of receiving vaccinations in pregnancy while addressing vaccine-specific concerns. FUNDING: This work was supported by Suzanne Cutler Vaccination Education & Research Fund at the Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine for funding and support.